World's largest offshore recruiter may cast off doubts as market hots up, writes Phil Baty
The US is poised to seize an even greater share of the lucrative international student market as its universities wake up to the potential of using overseas recruiting agents.
Priyanthi Dissanayake, island's foremost independent student recruiter to US posing with some of her American partners. By teaming up with as many as 23 schools all offering comprehensive financial aid and instant admission decisions round the year she is able to offer the widest choice to her students. Among them are exclusive and elite private liberal arts schools as well as low cost public community colleges. Some of them are huge public research universities with 40,000 students whereas some only have less than 2,000. Some are in the middle of large cities whereas others are in remote peaceful countryside or beautiful suburbs. Some require A/Ls and some only require O/Ls. She believes her success is based on her ability to offer a fitting school to Lankans of different academic and financial background seeking most affordable US education.
A report this week from the Observatory on Borderless Higher education says that the US has established itself as the world's largest recruiter of international students without any help from the agents that its rivals have long relied upon.
But the report states that the "tide may be about to turn" and the US could be set to embrace agents for the first time.
It says: "Some American colleges' officials now believe that the use of offshore recruiting agents makes increasing sense. Foreign students are recognised as an important means to internationalise their campuses and to close their budget gaps through the higher tuition fees these students often pay.
"Although the US remains the most popular destination for international students, other countries with more aggressive recruitment strategies have steadily cut into the US market share in the past decade."
According to the latest figures from the Higher Education Statistics agency, the US had 623,800 overseas students in 2007-08, compared with 389,330 in the UK.
While the use of agents to attract overseas students is widespread in the UK, it has been extremely rare in the US. American law bans the payment of agents in the domestic recruitment market, which has led to a widespread misconception that overseas agents are also banned, says the report, Leading the Horse to Water.
There have also been lingering ethical concerns in the US about the use of agents, because there is a perception that "when recruiters are being said ... their first priority may often be their own financial gain, rather than the student's interest", the report says. "In addition, it is difficult for university administrators to ensure that their offshore agents are not misrepresenting their institutions abroad."
However, the report adds that ethical concerns "may now be about to turn", with plans for US regulation of the agency market.
Benefit all players
The American International Recruitment Council (AIRC), a non-profit body, is drawing up a set of ethical standards and a system for certifying foreign recruiters, the report says.
It has begun a pilot certification programme with an initial group of eight foreign recruitment agencies, including firms operating in China, Denmark, Germany, India and Thailand.
One participant in the pilot scheme is IDP Education, Australia's largest international student recruitment company, which has 850 staff in 75 offices based in 24 countries.
IDP announced in May that it would be branching out to help US institutions. It aims to have 60 American bodies on its books in time to recruit students for the 2010-11 academic year. A week after IDP declared its move, Hobsons, in international education services firm, said it would offer recruitment services to US institutions.
Mitch Leventhal, chair of the AIRC and vice-provost for international affairs at the University of Cincinnati, said: "I think that US numbers will substantially increase due to the adoption of agency-based recruiting, which is being aggressively adapted to the US education system.
"Whether the US will increase its market share will depend on the growth of the market overall, combined with the marketing success of major competitors - the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and so on."
But he added that the use and regulation of agents by the US collaboration between UK and US institutions in the development of combined or joint programmes, whereby both sides can benefit from this new market reality," he said.
Don Olcott, chief executive of the Observatory, who has spent 25 years in US higher education, was more cautious about the likely effects on the international market.
He pointed out that while international students account for 25 per cent of total higher education enrolment in Australia and about 15 per cent in the UK, the US figure is only 3.5 per cent - so American institutions do not rely on the international market for survival.
"The fact is that the majority of the 4,130 colleges and universities in the US
re not dependent on international students," he said.
"Yes, you will have some that may use agents and some who more aggressively recruit international students in general, but one would need to look specifically at these institutions and where they fall on the overall =uality and reputation (spectrum of the US sector)."
He suggested that most US universities would still be reluctant to risk any unnecessary impact on their quality and excellence frameworks by =ngaging in what is still a questionable practice. The law says universities can use agents for foreign recruitment, but that raises the old adage: 'Just because you can doesn't mean you should'."