Pillay visiting Nepal and India, not Lanka

Sri Lanka is not on the itinerary of Navi Pillay, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who is currently on an official visit to Nepal and India.Last week a row erupted between her office and the Sri Lanka government over a statement Ms. Pillay had released on the Sri Lanka conflict.

Rupert Colville, spokesman for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), said the High Commissioner’s visit to Nepal was planned some time back. He said Nepal was one of the OHCHR’s biggest country operations, and that the country was selected as one of Ms. Pillay’s first overseas destinations.

Navi Pillay

Mr. Colville said the one-day visit to India was included in the itinerary after Ms. Pillay was invited to give a lecture there. He denied that Ms. Pillay was avoiding Sri Lanka.

“She is not avoiding Sri Lanka. It is still very early in her tenure,” Mr. Colville said, adding that he was not aware of any specific request to visit Sri Lanka.“It is not necessarily normal practice for the High Commissioner for Human Rights to visit a country where a conflict is in full swing,” he said, in response to an e-mail query about whether the High Commissioner had intended to visit Sri Lanka.

He said the OHCHR differed slightly from other organisations that had large humanitarian operations, such as the UNHCR, the WFP and UNICEF. “When they are involved in a major crisis, they will often try to visit fairly early on in the operation, because they have a multi-million dollar programme to manage and account for, and feel they need to get a feel of how it is working on the ground, meet their staff, etc. We don’t have a multi-million dollar operation in Sri Lanka,” Mr. Colville said.

Meanwhile, Sri Lanka will be forwarding a comprehensive statement this week in response to High Commissioner Pillay’s March 13 report, which alleges serious violations of international human rights laws in the Sri Lanka conflict.

“The response, which is being finalised, will be sent within the week,” Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama said. The government is challenging the civilian casualty figures provided by Ms. Pillay, saying they were based on figures released by LTTE propagandists. Ms. Pillay’s statement refers to a range of “credible sources” that suggest that more than 2,800 civilians may have been killed and more than 7,000 injured since January 20, and that many of the incidents took place inside no-fire zones.

The OHCHR spokesman said the organisation had noted the government’s reaction but fully stood by the OHCHR statement made a week ago.

Top to the page  |  E-mail  |  views[1]
Other News Articles
UN split on Lankan issue
IMF team here today to hold talks on crucial loan
WHO experts here for Rubella probe
Presidential pardon bypasses legal process
Three Indian airports on alert after LTTE threat
A heritage house gets second chance
Garbage crisis growing by the day
People battle LTTE as troops close in
Batticaloa loses a father figure
Missing Buddha statues: HRC raps Buddhist Affairs Commissioner
Pillay visiting Nepal and India, not Lanka
TNA MP to back Govt.
Officials attacked for preventing illegal sand mining
Hedging: Central Bank tells SCB to show cause
Parliament to sit for extra session
Tissa against terrorism but for justice
Record numbers enter cleared areas
Patients suffer for lack of thyroxin
Come buy our air time: SLBC tells private sector
Health Ministry making every effort to contain chickenpox epidemic
Hunt on for child murder suspect
Rain water storage system for new buildings a must
AG’s office turns 125
Hope for desperate patients
Bank owed Rs.17 b
Crisis at Muslim Peace Secretariat
Jailors to be hauled up following union action
10 years of Excellence in Journalism Awards
Indian Army back in medical garb, but is Delhi losing grip on Lanka? - Exclusive


Reproduction of articles permitted when used without any alterations to contents and a link to the source page.
© Copyright 2008 | Wijeya Newspapers Ltd.Colombo. Sri Lanka. All Rights Reserved.| Site best viewed in IE ver 6.0 @ 1024 x 768 resolution