International

Simmering separatism in India's northeast

Our northeast remains disturbed, although not like Pakistan's northwest. The fires burning in the Indian region are mostly political. They are nowhere a conflagration in the name of religion as is the case in Pakistan. However, both the countries face a problem which cannot be resolved only with force. The beleaguered people want development and free say. These aspirations have to be appreciated so that the policies are formulated accordingly.

I have returned from Assam quite disturbed. The state has been wracked by many agitations for a long time. I recall covering the convulsions it went through when there was a movement to oust foreigners, illegal entrants from Bangladesh. The All Assam Students Union (AASU), which was then leading the agitation, entered into an accord with the then Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi, who promised to detect foreigners and delete their names from the voters list. They were to be ultimately ousted from the state.
Nothing like that has happened. In fact, the Assamese have been reduced to 40 per cent in the state. Even when the accord was reached, I doubted if it could be implemented.

The centre had tried to disperse the migrants among the Indian states. But none agreed to rehabilitate them. After the lapse of some years, it is clear that there is no probability of ousting the foreigners. New Delhi should consider issuing work permits because those who cross into India from across the border come in search of livelihood. They want to return to homeland. Since they have no other option they stay back and face the perennial harassment.

It is the New Delhi-AASU accord which gave birth to United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA). The front has raised the standard of sovereign Assam state and clash with the security forces openly. The violence has led to the killing of thousands of people both in Assam and at the places where the ULFA cadre has sought refuge, particularly at the foothills of Bhutan and the border of Myanmar.

The breakthrough in the ULFA challenge came about when Bangladesh handed over to India the outfits chairman Archinda Rajkova, the party's ideologue Bhimkanta Buragohain and a few others. The five rebel outfits in the region have characterized Dhakas' gesture to Delhi as betrayal and they have vowed revenge. This has not deterred Bangladesh which has declared to root out Indian militant outfits from its soil.

No doubt, the state government is trying its best to enter into a dialogue with the ULFA. But the latter's refusal to give up the sovereignty demand has posed a problem. Probably the detained ULFA leaders want their commander-in-chief Paresh Barua to join them before they hold talks. The ULFA does not seem to realize that no Indian government can talk to them on secession because there are some other movements in the country agitating for the same demand.

What has made me more concerned after a visit to Guwahati is the attitude of Asom Gana Parishad (AGP), the main opposition party to the ruling Congress. The AGP is itself against the demand for sovereignty but supports the ULFA stand for no pre-condition for talks. The AGP obviously wants to harness the sympathy which the ULFA evokes in the state. I was surprised to see the evidence in Guwahati itself. My remark at a seminar that the ULFA leaders should not have been handcuffed was received by the audience with a resounding applause. People in Assam or, for that matter, in South Asia, do not seem to realize that those who raise the gun against the state cannot be given any room because their success means the destruction of polity.

ULFA rebels in Assam: Indian government policies have not addressed the cause of rebellion

The ULFA should tear a leaf out of the Nagas book. Their leder, Phizo, made the same demand for sovereignty and went to London to direct the revolt in Nagaland. I was India's High Commissioner to Britain when Phizo died. One of his comrades, Khodao-Yanthan met me after Phizo's death.

Since the days of the insurgency in Nagaland, Yanthan had been living in Britain. He told me he wanted to go to Nagaland to adivse his old friends to give up violence and seek a solution within the framework of united India. Ours was a friendly meeting. I was confident that he would be a moderating influence on the extremists. I informed New Delhi about his visit which I could not follow because I had resigned by the time he met the Indian governments representatives.

Yanthan told me that Phizo had changed and wanted to settle the Nagaland question within the contours of India, not outside. I wish I had met him. I was told that his death had taken place long before it was announced. My journalist friend, Harish Chandola (Phizo's niece is married to him) vainly tried in London to get the death certificate to determine the date of his demise. I also asked the High Commission officials to look into the matter but did not get any satisfactory response.

Yanthan was insistent on describing his nationality as Naga in the visa application. The Consular section was bent upon rejecting it on the ground that India did not recognize Nagaland as a separate country. I intervened and wrote on his visa application that the Nagas were Indians. He got a visa. I thought it was important that he visited Nagaland and tell the militant fringe that Phizo had himself renounced violence and had proposed talks on Nagalands integration with India. I wonder if the northeast in India and northwest in Pakistan can learn from Phizo.

I feel New Delhi’s policy on the northeast has not been realistic. Jawaharlal Nehru kept the area separate and secluded so as to preserve the culture of the people living there. Indeed, this is a weighty consideration for any government. But it should ensure that the area is not cut off from the mainstream, affecting not only the emotional ties but also the economic and social development.

True, the Taliban menace which Pakistan faces has to be eliminated. But Islamabad must realize that there must have been something lacking in its rule which could not bring about the emotional integration of the territory with the rest of Pakistan.

Top to the page  |  E-mail  |  views[1]
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
 
Other International Articles
Simmering separatism in India's northeast
Neanderthal 'make-up' discovered
Ancient Mars lakes revealed in new images
A dissident in China
Three held over 'bomb threat' on London plane: police
Nigerian bomb suspect pleads not guilty
Germany braces for blizzard as freezing Europe shivers
Unknown thugs set fire to Indian man in Melbourne: police
N.Ireland leader vows to clear name over wife's lover

 

 
Reproduction of articles permitted when used without any alterations to contents and a link to the source page.
© Copyright 2010 | Wijeya Newspapers Ltd.Colombo. Sri Lanka. All Rights Reserved.| Site best viewed in IE ver 6.0 @ 1024 x 768 resolution