| Beware 
              of the new Greeks bearing giftsA couple of weeks ago fellow columnist Rajpal Abeynayake took to 
              task "NGO wallahs" for their pretentious claims to supreme 
              wisdom and moral legitimacy.
  Quite 
              rightly he did not put all the NGO eggs in one basket. His barbs 
              were directed at the bad eggs and surely there are some whose outer 
              shell hides more than a yolk.  When 
              colonialism was paraded before the western world as civilising missions, 
              traders and proselytisers followed in the steps of the foot soldiers. 
              In this neo-colonialist world the new proselytisers do not come 
              with bible in hand to turn the heathens into heavenly souls. They 
              come in the guise of benign foreign-funded organisations scattering 
              dollars and kroners all in the name of international goodwill and 
              to lend a helpful hand to solve our many problems.  Today 
              there are no petty traders following colonial armies. Instead multinationals 
              and corporate businesses rush in to sell their wares and exploit 
              an increasingly consumerist society.  Vultures 
              gather when carrion is seen. In an increasingly conflict and poverty-ridden 
              world where literally thousands die each day, do-gooders backed 
              by international donors gather to proffer friendly advice and help.  Peace 
              and conflict-prevention and resolution: this has been the growth 
              industry for many years as AIDS has become today with NGOs scrambling 
              to get into the act. Some of these NGOs are headed by individuals 
              who think they are Zeus descended from Olympus. It is a pity that 
              responsible sections of civil society, not to mention the government 
              itself, do not examine closely the role and operational techniques 
              of some of these NGOs that have proliferated like mushrooms in Sri 
              Lanka in recent years, particularly those that parade as promoters 
              of reconciliation and makers of peace.  Having 
              spent a month or so in Sri Lanka recently one could quite understand 
              Abeynayake's anger at the attempts of some NGOs and their leading 
              figures to vigorously whitewash the actions of the high and mighty 
              in our society or wipe away with the gloss of innocence the terrorism 
              and violence returning to haunt the country after what was hoped 
              would be a continuing period of quiet.  People 
              are becoming apprehensive about the number of foreign-funded NGOs 
              operating in the country. There are some who are truly sceptical 
              of the intentions of some of these organisations that have sprung 
              up, especially those who appear to have inveigled themselves into 
              the upper crust of our society and into officialdom on the back 
              of the peace process.  Admittedly 
              there are both government and non-government organisations that 
              deal with issues that have no obvious political implications. If 
              organisations wish to hone the professional skills or the educational 
              levels of one group or another, I doubt whether one could seriously 
              object to that, unless an insidious intention is hidden behind a 
              benign public face.  The 
              danger comes largely from those foreign-funded organisations that 
              appear in the lily-white garb of peacemakers and the harbingers 
              of international goodwill and aid.  We 
              know that well-known multilateral institutions that are in fact 
              in the hands of big and powerful nations, have been publicly indicted 
              for interfering in the internal affairs of nations, sowing the seeds 
              of dissension and conflict, of corruption and abuse, all in the 
              name 'development'.  Those 
              who have not read former "Economist" journalist Graham 
              Hancock's book "Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige and Corruption 
              of the International Aid Business" should do so if they could 
              lay their hands on this classic critique of what he calls the international 
              aid business - and business it truly is.  Hancock's 
              data might be dated - the book was released some 12 years ago - 
              but he does make us question the true nature of aid and charity. 
              He makes one wonder at the disempowering effect this so-called charity 
              and aid have on those who are the recipients of such international 
              largesse.  Two 
              years ago Michael Maren who spent many years in Africa wrote the 
              "Road to Hell: The Ravaging Effects of Foreign Aid & International 
              Charity", citing specific cases and highlighting the hypocrisy, 
              corruption and sheer ineptitude behind aid and charitable work in 
              the developing world.   More 
              recently David Rieff, who spent many years with several humanitarian 
              organisations, wrote a damning book titled "A Bed for the Night: 
              Humanitarianism in Crisis," that also held up to public scrutiny 
              much of what goes on in the humanitarian care industry.  Collectively 
              these exposes lift the mask off much of the hoopla and spin that 
              surround international aid and 'humanitarian' help. But it is not 
              just the corruption, the misguided and inept use of aid by multilateral 
              institutions and NGOs that trouble writers and those who have personal 
              knowledge of them.  It 
              is also the involvement of foreign-funded organisations in internal 
              political disputes and conflicts in the name of peace making and 
              conflict resolution that has, in several instances, exacerbated 
              the problems.  Readers 
              might recall the involvement of a London-based but Scandinavian 
              funded organisation "International Alert" that was first 
              headed by Martin Ennals, a one time Secretary-General of Amnesty 
              International.  Weeks 
              before the May 1997 military coup that ousted President Tejan Kabbah 
              of Sierra Leone, a poor African country but still very rich in mineral 
              resources such as diamonds, gold and radio-active substances, he 
              wrote to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, accusing International 
              Alert of meddling in the country's internal affairs and actually 
              supporting the rebel RUF. During the peace negotiations, President 
              Kabbah accused International Alert of advocacy on behalf of the 
              rebels instead of the facilitator it claimed to be.  The 
              president named in particular two individuals, who he said, "embarked 
              upon sabotaging all efforts at implementing the peace." This 
              same organisation closed its Colombo office after firing its Colombo 
              programme manager for writing articles critical of the LTTE, though 
              it seems to have accepted without demur articles critical of the 
              Sri Lanka Government and its military.  Where 
              one closes down others step into the breach. At times the same individuals 
              keep emerging under new organisations and generally funded by Scandinavians, 
              notably the Norwegians.  Those 
              who know of the activities of Redd Barna, a Norwegian NGO operating 
              in northern Sri Lanka some 25 or 30 years ago, might wonder why 
              we still let such organisations set up base in the country without 
              a proper scrutiny of their antecedents, their funding, their objectives 
              and the individuals who run them and monitoring their activities.  Nobody 
              would object to genuine humanitarian organisations that keep their 
              fingers out of explosive and highly sensitive domestic issues, particularly 
              ethnic and religious conflicts. But now in the name of peace, even 
              Trojan horses appear to be welcome, especially when the White man 
              is astride the horse and the native walks faithfully by its side. 
               |