Columns - The Sunday Times Economic Analysis

Dwindling foreign exchange reserves

By the Economist

The Central Bank is certain that the foreign exchange reserves of the country at the end of 2008 are quite adequate. The gross official reserves of US$ 1,753 million by end December 2008 it states are equivalent to 1.5 months of imports on the basis of the previous 12 month average imports. The Bank also makes the point that the “total reserves, with and without ACU funds, by end 2008 were US $ 3,799 million and US $ 2,992 million respectively and these reserve levels are equivalent to 3.3 and 2.6 months of imports, respectively.” These several figures, especially the counting of reserves in the Asian Clearing Union as part of the country’s reserves, have contributed to some confusion. However that is not the issue that we would address here. We discuss here some of the basic issues in the external finances of the country and the emerging situation. The fact is that the external reserves have come down and there is a public apprehension that they are at a critically low level.

The Central Bank points out that the adequacy of the reserves for imports has been based on the high import bill of last year and that current and expected low imports, resulting from the sharp reduction in the oil and petroleum product import bills, would ensure that the actual number of months of imports is much higher than those quoted above. This is most likely as the downturn in import prices of oil in particular will ease the trade balance. The monthly requirements of imports are likely to be less than those of 2008. There are however other aspects that have to be considered too. This is in respect to the prospects for the country’s exports that we discuss later in this column.

Irrespective of the adequacy of the reserves for imports, the serious concern is that the foreign exchange reserves have been dwindling last year. This is clear when one compares the reserves at the end of the two previous years. In 2006 foreign exchange reserves (total official assets) were US $ 4005 million. At the end of 2007 it had risen to US$ 4956 million. The foreign exchange reserves at the end of 2008 were much lower at 2992 million US $. Therefore it is clear that the external reserves had dwindled significantly and were much lower than what it was at the end of the previous year. This is an incontrovertible fact. Moreover even when the foreign exchange reserves rose in 2007, it was due to heavy borrowing by the government. In fact the decrease in the foreign reserves in 2008 was partly owing to the repayment of loans taken previously.

The Central Bank’s expectation that import expenditure would be less this year is quite reasonable as import prices of petroleum and other essential imports have been low this year. If they remain at a low level, which is likely, there is no reason to think that the recessionary conditions would be reversed in the next ten months. Then the import bill would be significantly lower. Even more certain is the fact that even if oil prices rise they will not reach the heights of last year. In 2008 the country spent US $ 3368 million on oil imports alone. This was almost one fourth (24 percent) of the total import expenditure of US $ 14,008 million.

It may be realistic to expect the expenditure on oil to be about 30 percent less. Such an expectation is based not only on the price of oil remaining at current levels but that domestic consumption will not rise. Further reduction in the domestic fuel price could change this expectation. This is an important argument for keeping the price of petroleum products high through taxation. Similarly the prices of other imports are expected to remain around current levels. Lesser economic activity, especially in respect to manufactures, would also ease intermediate imports. If this were to happen then the import bill of the country would be significantly less.

There is however another part of the trade equation that must be considered. While import expenditure is likely to decline, export revenues too could drop significantly. This has happened in recent months. For instance, last December exports declined by 19.1 per cent compared to December 2007. The performance of agricultural and industrial exports, have been adversely affected by the downturn in commodity prices. Tea exports earnings decreased by 22.5 per cent in December mainly due to price reductions in the international market. Similarly rubber prices are on the decline. Therefore in considering the trade balance for this year the prospects of export expenditure decreasing must be counter balanced by the prospect of lower agricultural and industrial export earnings. On balance, the recessionary conditions are likely to benefit the trade balance more than being unfavourable to it. However any optimistic expectations in improvements in import expenditure must be tempered with the prospect of lower export earnings. The trade deficit may be less than in 2008, but it would nevertheless be a deficit and not a small deficit either.

The persistent trade deficits have not generally resulted in balance of payments deficits owing to capital inflows. Despite the unfavourable developments in trade the country has had small surpluses in the balance of payments. In 2007 the balance of payments surplus was US$ 531 million. In 2008 too the expectation is a balance of payments surplus of about US$ 400 million. In recent years this surplus in the balance of payment has been achieved owing to private remittances from abroad and large scale foreign borrowings. Private remittances have counterbalanced a significant proportion of the trade deficit. For instance in 2008 private remittances financed around one half of the trade deficit. In 2008 apart from the massive trade deficit there was an outflow of funds to repay a part of the foreign loans borrowed in earlier years. This also accounts for the dwindling of the foreign reserves of the country.

No doubt the government has plans to replenish the reserves through further borrowing. It is very important that such borrowing is on terms that are not too onerous. It is vital that the problem faced by the country at the present moment is not transformed into a burden for the future. The foreign debt of the country has reached a high proportion already and every effort must be made to ensure that debt servicing costs are not excessively onerous.

Top to the page  |  E-mail  |  views[1]
Other Columns
Political Column
Lanka marches into multiple crisis
5th Column

Adjust borders and attract voters, and bull your way forward!

The Economic Analysis
Dwindling foreign exchange reserves
Lobby
Not issued on this week
Focus on Rights
Inside the glass house

 

 
Reproduction of articles permitted when used without any alterations to contents and a link to the source page.
© Copyright 2008 | Wijeya Newspapers Ltd.Colombo. Sri Lanka. All Rights Reserved.| Site best viewed in IE ver 6.0 @ 1024 x 768 resolution