Letters to the Editor
View(s):Tenant Protection Bill: Is the cure worse than the disease?
Quite rightly, the Government has agreed in court to reconsider the proposed Tenant Protection Bill. As currently worded, the Bill dangerously tilts the balance in favour of tenants, including those who default on rent, damage property, and fail to pay electricity and water bills—while leaving landlords virtually powerless.
If enacted in this form, the consequences are predictable. Investors will stop building houses for rental purposes, and existing owners will withdraw their properties from the rental market. The inevitable result will be a severe shortage of rental accommodation and a sharp escalation in rents—hurting precisely the people the Bill claims to protect.
This is not theoretical. I write from bitter personal experience of renting out my house in Kandy. I spent considerable time and money travelling from Colombo attempting to resolve the matter amicably. When all ethical and legal avenues failed, only a firm ultimatum forced the tenant to vacate. I lost two years of rent and had to spend an equivalent sum on repairs and refurbishment. Disillusioned, I stopped renting the house altogether. It has remained closed for over 12 years.
This is the reality many landlords face. Laws that ignore such ground realities will not create fairness; they will destroy confidence. A just legal framework must protect genuine tenants without criminalising or discouraging property owners.
The Minister in charge must ask a simple question: can a housing market survive if the law rewards non-payment and punishes ownership?
Upali Weerasinghe Via email
Searching for an ideal partner? Find your soul mate on Hitad.lk, Sri Lanka's favourite marriage proposals page. With Hitad.lk matrimonial advertisements you have access to thousands of ads from potential suitors who are looking for someone just like you.