Columns

In a dramatic escalation of Middle East tensions, Israel has once again demonstrated its capacity to brazenly set the global security agenda, launching targeted attacks on Iranian facilities and killing key Iranian officials. The international community, caught off guard and seemingly in disarray, watches as a dangerous new chapter unfolds, threatening to engulf the region and beyond in an uncontrollable conflagration.

The timing of these attacks is particularly striking, raising serious questions about Israel’s true intentions. They occurred precisely as the United States and Iran were preparing for crucial talks on Iran’s nuclear programme. The question that naturally arises is whether Israel’s actions were a deliberate attempt to pre-empt any progress in these diplomatic efforts, ensuring the perpetual state of tension in the Middle East that appears to serve its strategic interests. 

The aftermath of the Israeli strikes has exposed a profound lack of cohesion and resolve among world leaders, who appear to contradict themselves and watch helplessly as Israel does as it pleases. The recent G7 leaders’ joint statement, intended to project unity, bizarrely expressed support for Israel, despite Israel clearly casting the first stone and initiating unprovoked hostilities. This dissonance underscores the deep divisions and conflicting priorities that paralyse a coordinated international response.

Perhaps most illustrative of this global muddle is the stance taken by three of the G7 countries. Germany’s Foreign Minister together with his UK and French counterparts were simultaneously holding urgent talks in Geneva with the Iranian Foreign Minister in an attempt to de-escalate the conflict. Such conflicting signals from within the same alliance reveal a profound policy schizophrenia.

The gravity of the situation has not been lost on the United Nations. The harassed looking UN Secretary-General António Guterres has graphically articulated the peril, stating, “The Israeli-Iran conflict has set up a fire which is difficult, if not impossible, to control.” His words resonate with a desperate plea for reason in a region teetering on the brink.

However, the fire can indeed be doused. Iran has unequivocally expressed its willingness to cease its retaliatory measures if Israel calls a halt to its attacks. Speaking from Tehran, Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian declared, “Our response was a warning. If the Zionist regime ceases its aggression, our response ceases. The ball is now in their court for peace.” This olive branch offers a clear, immediate path to de-escalation, yet Israel, thus far, remains committed to its aggressive posture.

Across the Atlantic, US President Donald Trump’s response has added another layer of confusion. Initially stating he would decide in a couple of days whether to join the fray on behalf of Israel, he has now announced his trademark “pause” of two weeks to take a decision. This delay, coupled with his public dismissal of his own country’s expert intelligence, highlights a dangerous trend.

The United States Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard reiterated the Agency’s findings in testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee on March 25, stating, “The [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei has not authorised the nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2003.”

Yet, President Trump has now directly contradicted Gabbard, telling reporters on his flight back from the G7 summit, “I don’t care what she said. I think they [the Iranians] were very close to having it.” This rejection of his own intelligence chief’s assessment is a chilling indication that the stands he and many other leaders take are not evidence-based but rather on whims and prejudices, putting at risk the lives of thousands of people in the Middle East and causing ripple effects across the globe.

With regard to Iran’s nuclear programme, the current Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, has expressed concerns about the lack of cooperation by Iran and called upon it to reverse its non-cooperative steps towards the IAEA by restoring inspector access, and allowing full verification mechanisms.

Adding further weight to the US intelligence community’s assessment, Grossi has however consistently confirmed that “there is no evidence to confirm Iran is building a nuclear weapon.” The IAEA has stated that any concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear programme must be resolved through diplomacy and that any military action in this regard would be in violation of international law.

Addressing the Security Council on June 13, Grossi said his agency was in constant contact with the Iranian Nuclear Regulatory Authority to assess the status of affected facilities and determine broader impacts on nuclear safety and security. After the June 13 Israeli strikes, the IAEA confirmed that the facility at Natanz had been impacted, but reported no elevated radiation levels. However, it emphasised that any military attack on nuclear facilities is a violation of international law and poses serious risks to safety and the environment.

The message from the IAEA is clear: even if there are legitimate concerns about Iran’s nuclear programme, the solution lies in diplomatic engagement, not military action.

The parameters of Israel’s attacks — unprovoked, strategically timed to undermine diplomatic efforts, and met with a chaotic global response — show a country on a journey of its own, seemingly impervious to international norms or the pleas for de-escalation. The contradictory stances of world leaders, their refusal or helplessness in reining in the conflict, and their willingness to disregard verifiable intelligence for political expediency, have created a perilous situation.

Israel’s unprovoked attacks have also succeeded in diverting the attention of the world away from the continuing carnage in Gaza, where hungry civilians including women and children continue to face the merciless onslaught of the Israeli forces.

As the UN Secretary-General warned, a fire has been lit. With leaders demonstrating a dangerous blend of confusion and contradiction, human society finds itself at grave risk, teetering precariously on the edge of a conflict that could spiral beyond anyone’s control. The time for genuine, evidence-based diplomacy, and a unified international front, is not just urgent — it is an absolute necessity for global survival.

(javidyusuf@gmail.com).