| Will 
              Clinton's charm change tsunami pledges into cash? NEW YORK - Former US President Bill Clinton has always been an inveterate 
              charmer with an ability to win friends and influence people. Even 
              during his days in the White House, he was known to be lively and 
              ebullient compared to his colourless vice president Al Gore who 
              was considered a bore.
  The 
              contrasting personalities were best laid out by a stand-up comedian 
              who remarked jokingly that Clinton was such a politically seductive 
              guy that he will be quick to take you to bed -- only to have the 
              wooden Al Gore put you to sleep.  Notwithstanding 
              his sexual escapades both inside and outside the White House, Clinton 
              was given a standing ovation when he addressed the 191-member UN 
              General Assembly the very week his political enemies began a hearing 
              in Capitol Hill to impeach him.  Last 
              week, he returned to the world body, this time as the UN Special 
              Envoy for Tsunami Recovery, an appointment made by Secretary-General 
              Kofi Annan.  Clinton, 
              who has already visited some of the tsunami-affected countries, 
              including Indonesia, Thailand, Sri Lanka and the Maldives, was formally 
              introduced to the UN press corps by Annan, his new boss.  When 
              he was faced with the inevitable question about widespread rumours 
              that he is harbouring ambitions to take over Annan's job which is 
              mandated to end December 2006, Clinton was dexterously evasive. 
                He 
              did not provide either a positive or a negative answer, leaving 
              the lingering question up in the air. "I support the Secretary-General 
              we have. I like him, I admire him, I think he's doing a good job," 
              he said.   As 
              for his own future plans, Clinton said: "I like the job I have. 
              So I'm going to do the job I've got. I am his (Annan's) employee. 
              It would be unseemly for me to be anything else right now." 
                It 
              would also be unseemly for a former US president to be the Secretary-General 
              taking orders from the US ambassador to the UN, and it would break 
              a longstanding tradition to have a Secretary-General from one of 
              the five veto-wielding permanent members of the Security Council 
              -- in this case the United States.  Still, 
              Clinton's answer is in marked contrast to the response given by 
              former US Secretary of State Colin Powell who was rumoured to be 
              interested in the job of World Bank president. "I don't want 
              to be an employee of the World Bank in any capacity," he said. 
                With 
              that blunt answer, Powell's name was taken off the list of contenders 
              for the World Bank job, which eventually went to former US Deputy 
              Secretary of Defence Paul Wolfowitz. Unlike Powell, Clinton was 
              less forthright in his answer.  The 
              big story, however, was not Clinton's evasive answer but rising 
              complaints that donors who pledged money for tsunami recovery are 
              painfully slow in honouring their commitments. When Annan was asked 
              about the sluggish flow of pledged aid to tsunami-affected countries, 
              he told reporters: "Pledges are good but cash is better."  But 
              unfortunately liquid cash is not forthcoming. So far, about $6.7 
              billion have been promised for tsunami relief by donor countries, 
              private individuals and corporations, of which about $5.8 billion 
              have been pledged by 92 governments.  "Such 
              generosity had never been recorded in the history of the United 
              Nations," says Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs 
              Jan Egeland.  But 
              of the $6.7 billion pledged, only about $2.5 billion have been "recorded 
              as committed or paid up." The problem, Egeland says, is to 
              convert pledges into cash commitments.  The 
              familiar refrain is that the pledges come in only when the world 
              media saturate newspapers and home television sets with the horrors 
              of the tragedies -- be it earthquakes, floods or hurricanes. But 
              no sooner TV cameras move out of the devastated areas, the tragedies 
              are quickly forgotten -- and the bucks stop there.  The 
              UN now wants to be more aggressive in following-up on pledges, and 
              issue periodic reports keeping a running tab on the cash flow, listing 
              who offered what, and who defaulted on their commitments. The shortfall 
              in anticipated resources can significantly hamper rebuilding efforts 
              in all of the tsunami-affected countries.  Last 
              week, the New York Times reported that recovery has been exceedingly 
              slow in Aceh province in Indonesia, where nearly 126,000 died in 
              the tsunami disaster. "There 
              is little sign in Aceh of the billions of dollars in donations from 
              governments, aid organisations, civic groups and individual people 
              who reached out to help from around the world," the Times said. 
              Clinton doesn't think there is "donor fatigue". "We 
              don't know whether donor fatigue has set in, and whether commitments 
              aren't being kept, until we have national plans (of reconstruction).''  Clinton 
              said there are "lots of NGOs that have enormous amounts of 
              money. I mean the Red Cross has got a staggering amount of money. 
              And you can't really expect them to spend it until there's a plan 
              on which they can spend it, where they can say, okay, this is where 
              I fit into this plan; this is where I belong and what I am going 
              to do."  Standing 
              besides Clinton, Annan told reporters: "I rely on him to make 
              sure that donors not only pledge but disburse the money needed for 
              recovery and reconstruction, and that it actually reaches the communities 
              who need it most." Let's stay tuned to see how Clinton's charm 
              offensive will work. |