| Some 
              war against terrorThe World Bank country director Peter Harrold was good enough to 
              grant us an interview last week. We do not want to lambaste him 
              for his magnanimity. But he has not been able to stand the heat. 
              In the face of mounting criticism on his thoughts shared with us, 
              he has gone scurrying to the media, both state and private, and 
              sought to challenge the newspaper as well as the Deputy Editor who 
              interviewed him.
  His 
              shifting stance on the issues speak for itself. He first says he 
              has been misquoted. But when we announced we would go to print, 
              with the full transcript of the interview, he backtracked to say 
              that that it is possible for a reasonable person to have misunderstood 
              him.  On 
              the face of it, what Mr. Peter Harrold has said is probably true. 
              He says there is an un-official state under LTTE control. This is 
              true. So why is he backtracking now? He says the Sri Lanka Government 
              has warmed up to the LTTE, which is patent fact. He says that there 
              needs to be a mechanism to disburse funds in the LTTE held areas. 
              Too true, too. But yet, Peter Harrold is now in the awkward position 
              of having to say that he never meant to say any of this. He does 
              not fear a roasting at the hands of local nationalist forces, he 
              says, but clearly he is hyper anxious about the wrath of his superiors 
              in Washington for speaking out of turn.   In 
              the process of trying to rectify what is tantamount to a breach 
              of protocol and a breach of the World Bank’s code of conduct 
              for its senior officials, Mr. Harrold first tried to shoot his way 
              out of trouble. Then he tried to negotiate his way out of it, and 
              fell flat on his face trying to save face.  He 
              tries to claim he never said LTTE-controlled areas are 'an un-official 
              state'. If we grant that’s the case, hypothetically, what 
              has he to say regarding the rest of the contents of the interview? 
              He says the World Bank considers the LTTE a "legitimate stakeholder" 
              in aid flow to the north and east of the Republic of Sri Lanka, 
              and we wonder whether this is the official position of the Bank. 
              Apparently not, even though, of late the World Bank has been trying 
              to get a toe-hold in the country’s peace process, very much 
              like the UN.  The 
              LTTE may be a stakeholder, but that’s different from saying 
              that its stakeholder status is legitimate. Mr. Harrold, even in 
              his second press release, and his television interviews does not 
              deny having accorded the LTTE this amount of legitimacy. This newspaper 
              has no intention of splitting hair on the nuances of all this verbiage, 
              and the now admitted poor diction of the World Bank country director. 
              That’s despite the fact that he now admits to parse words, 
              and is in a fit of remorse about what he said.   All 
              we have to say is that there has been an increasing tendency for 
              foreign nationals such as he -- if we may say so -- to make "official 
              statements" on internal matters which they would dare not make 
              in most other countries.  The 
              inability on the part of Sri Lankan Governments to tell them a thing 
              or two about diplomatic niceties when serving in other sovereign 
              states, has allowed them to shoot their mouths off. The Government 
              is fair game for these nobodies who want to be somebodies. Once 
              assigned to Sri Lanka they see themselves as God’s gift to 
              our country, and therefore they cannot act with restraint. Their 
              ambitions get the better of them, and they are driven to burnish 
              their CV’s with a view to receiving kudos at headquarters 
              and better postings abroad. In the process, they fail to be sensitive 
              to the environment that they have to work in.  In 
              the case under review, ,clearly, Mr. Peter Harrold has referred 
              to the roasting he is getting from the National Patriotic Movement, 
              and will continue to get, for what he said in his interview with 
              The Sunday Times. In the process he has made the World Bank even 
              more unpopular with a sizeable section of Sri Lanka’s population 
              who believe he over-stepped the boundaries of protocol.  Some 
              of these czars see it fashionable to deal with terrorists, but they 
              will do it only in Sri Lanka. Some of them do feel like czars too, 
              as if they were dispensing their own largesse, and they do feel 
              so because they would indeed find some fawning people massaging 
              their egos.  One 
              must on the other hand, give credit to the LTTE for turning the 
              tsunami disaster into diplomatic and political advantage while the 
              Government in Colombo continues with its inability to rein in the 
              runaway bullies of the World Bank type. How many more years of Independence 
              do we need to get away from this colonial mind-set coupled with 
              a funk for neo-colonialists who continue to thrive on a Divide and 
              Rule policy in Sri Lanka? |