Lessons 
              US poll offers Lanka 
               
              And so, the ' moral majority ' of America gave their incumbent President 
              George W. Bush a resounding re-election victory. He will now rule 
              not only America, but the world for the next four years. Unfortunately, 
              the world did not get a chance to vote. 
             Even 
              the most ardent Bush fan will admit that the US President is not 
              the best loved outside the shores of that sub-continent.Two of Sri 
              Lanka's senior world affairs commentators, Thalif Deen ( in New 
              York ) and Neville de Silva ( in London ) make their observations 
              on the outcome of this week's US Presidential elections on page 
              14 of this issue respectively. CNN's senior international affairs 
              correspondent Christiane Amanpour refers to the US President as 
              “stupendously unpopular " outside his country. 
             In 
              West Asia, the moderates were deeply disappointed, while the extremists 
              drew vicarious delight on the basis that another four years was 
              what America needed to reap the whirlwind Bush has sown. And the 
              message of al-Qaeda's patron saint Osama bin-Laden on the eve of 
              the elections that a victory for the incumbent President would mean 
              that the American people are now culpable for the atrocities committed 
              in Iraq and elsewhere in the Islamic world is enough to send shivers 
              down anyone's spine. 
             In 
              any election, each voter has just one vote - to vote on multiple 
              issues. To consider the Bush victory a referendum on his foreign 
              policy cannot be the case.  
             Many 
              analysts say that he targeted the US voters' religious core. He 
              connected with faith and social values, perhaps making them overlook 
              negatives on his Iraq policy, the economy and jobs. For him to have 
              carried the state of Ohio where job-loss was severe is the classic 
              example. Only the liberal states on the coast picked his opponent. 
               
             The 
              Republicans were better organised and had more money to spend on 
              an election that is estimated to have cost US $ 3.4 billion. But 
              ultimately President Bush fell back on America's conservative roots 
              and whipped up religion to win.  
             There 
              are lessons to be learnt from the US elections. However bitterly 
              contested and acrimonious, there was no violence. Everyone got up 
              the next morning as Americans, of one deeply divided, but helluva 
              proud nation. That's what the winning candidate said, that's what 
              the loser said. 
             There 
              are many other exemplary lessons. For instance, the fixed term of 
              office for a President. Look what's happening in Sri Lanka now. 
              A President has been re-elected and officially sworn-in before the 
              nation. A secret oath-taking ceremony is supposed to have taken 
              place some months later and is now being considered the official 
              one, so that the President can have another year in office. 
             As 
              we said in these columns last week, it was not for Sri Lanka to 
              back either candidate. Bi-partisanship on all sides is paramount. 
              The fact that many Sri Lanka supporters won re-election to the US 
              Senate and as Governors is a positive sign for US — Sri Lanka 
              relations. Our ties with the new US Congress are good and provide 
              a strong platform to solidify the partnership. Our relations with 
              the Republicans and Democrats at all levels must be maintained for 
              an enduring relationship with that mega-power.  
             There 
              is however the need for Sri Lanka not to under-perform. The Bush 
              Administration wants strong allies, and they will do anything for 
              you then. In the current context, they want Sri Lanka to perform, 
              both on the economic front and on the peace process. 
             There 
              is no need for Sri Lanka to abandon its traditional solidarity with 
              the economically poor nations of this world, and back the US view 
              on the world economic order, nor compromise on its sovereignty for 
              the sake of jump-starting the peace process. But aimlessly doing 
              nothing about anything, with no substantive policy towards either, 
              is not going to win US support. 
             Meanwhile, 
              President Chandrika Kumaratunga is now in India, with hardly any 
              proper notice given to the public as to the status of her visit. 
              This may seem a trifling matter but Sri Lanka is a functioning democracy 
              and such proprieties should be observed. 
             Like 
              in the case with the US, Sri Lanka's new friendship thrust with 
              India ought to be based on a firm, equal status partnership. This 
              may evoke a smirk considering the relative muscle of the US or India 
              compared to puny Sri Lanka, but if we are a sovereign nation, we 
              should conduct our external relations as one. 
             There 
              is suddenly an increasing belief that there is an overwhelming Indian 
              economic presence in Sri Lanka. Friendship with India is unquestionable. 
              But get too close and you can hear the breathing down your neck. 
              It may be our small nation complex, but you can hear it, nevertheless.  |