| In 
              the rush for gold, we forget for whom 
              By Random Access Memory (RAM)
 Way back in the mid eighties, I recall attending a seminar on Sri 
              Lanka's transport management held at the SLAAS. The main topic for 
              discussion was the widening of roads.
  There 
              were presentations by eminent highway engineers illustrating the 
              merits of road widening and transforming them into multi-lane highways. 
              There was discussion on the socio-economic benefits of the highways 
              programme and how that will all contribute to a better quality of 
              life for our people as a whole. All were in agreement that Sri Lanka 
              badly needed a good and efficient network of highways.   On 
              the panel of experts sat the late John Diandas, the accountant and 
              self-learned transport expert par excellence and an extremely sensitive 
              human being, who after some deep thought quipped "have you 
              good gentlemen and ladies thought about the little child or the 
              older person who has to cross these highways?"  Please 
              do not get it wrong. John Diandas was not in anyway anti-progress 
              or development. On the contrary he was a strong advocate of a sound 
              system of rationally linked highways and efficient modes of transport. 
              His positions on the development of the railways, bicycle lanes 
              along highways rationalising its use were indeed ahead of the conventional 
              thinking of the eighties.  Most 
              importantly, he called for systems that could not only serve the 
              needs of the day, but those that can be sustained for long periods 
              of time serving the needs of a wider public and not just a few. 
              He in his wisdom always reminded us of the need to address the basic 
              issues of development and for whom all this was for?  Similarly 
              I recall how with the dawn of the new millennium, the formal business 
              sector was provided leadership with the adoption of a 'Vision 2020' 
              document by the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce under the stewardship 
              of the then Chairman, Chandra Jayaratne. The Vision called for a 
              national agenda for the private sector that was at the time on the 
              threshold of taking on the role of the 'Engine of Growth' for the 
              economy.   It 
              basically called on members of the Chamber to look beyond their 
              own interests giving priority to the interests of the nation, the 
              sector in which they operate in and the private sector.   The 
              'Vision 2020' recognised that the business sector needed to drive 
              a national agenda, if it was to create a conducive and sustainable 
              environment for business devoid of waves of conflicts and crisis.  It 
              called for the business sector to work with a deep sense of responsibility 
              being accountable for its actions, placing values of integrity and 
              transparency high on the agenda. It called for a sustained action 
              agenda to achieve these ideals.  The 
              leadership of the then Chairman won him the LMD's Sri Lankan of 
              the Year Award the next year, but the ideals of 'Vision 2020' were 
              safely placed on dusty shelves by the business sector. Ironically, 
              one is reminded of the merits and wisdom of the proposed visionary 
              directions, when we look at the events that unfold in our midst 
              in crisis proportions and the reactions of the business sector in 
              attempting to adopt knee jerk pressure tactics to 'solve' our deep-rooted 
              problems.  Looking 
              beyond one's nose calls for a lot of courage. The fine examples 
              set by the apparel sector with sound leadership to prepare for events 
              beyond 2005, serve as a good case study of the private sector driving 
              national agenda.   The 
              far-fetched action taken will indeed save thousands of jobs and 
              provide a platform for the sector to look beyond survival to thriving 
              in the quota-less open market domain.   What 
              is important to note is that these sector leaders did not seek handouts 
              from government or await the Ministry of Trade to lead negotiations 
              on their behalf or seek concessions for acquiring the needed technology. 
                Instead, 
              they led the government organisations, made the right moves and 
              adopted the most appropriate technology. Even at this late hour 
              it may be opportune for the business sector to adopt its own vision 
              for the future without being driven by the lofty 'visions' presented 
              in the political arena.   A 
              vision that will place achieving a dignified and lasting peace for 
              our country as a priority, together with a collective focus and 
              agenda on sustainability and social responsibility. Such a vision, 
              in RAM's mind, will provide a strong impetus to the business sector 
              to drive the mission of being the 'engine of growth'.   Away 
              from tinkering with issues such as who is right and who is wrong 
              on the political front, it is perhaps time for the business sector 
              to adopt a vision driven approach to join with all other like-minded 
              groups to form a true third force of a citizen's movement.  Such 
              an approach can provide the platform to address the issues of creation 
              of wealth for whom and how the efforts can be made to be truly sustainable, 
              benefiting the people and the nation of Sri Lanka.  |