Plus
26th December 1999

Front Page|
News/Comment|
Editorial/Opinion| Business| Sports|
Sports Plus| Mirror Magazine

The Sunday Times on the Web

Line

The development dilmma exposed

By Manik Sandrasagra

Having witnessed the consequence of 50 years of an alienated and myopic political vision that has all but destroyed the natural and cultural heritage of the people of this blessed island, Prahbakaran, the 'gonie billa' or the 'bogey-man', and the Eelam war may be blessings in disguise. As long as Prahbakaran is in our midst, we are told Sri Lanka will not enjoy economic growth. No foreign investment, no tourism, no big projects.

Post-colonial studies have disclosed that the new elite who came to dominate the independence movements in most colonies were as committed to the extractivist economy of the colonial regime as were the colonists of regime they helped unseat. For them, the argument was not over what type of economy to run, but over who should run it and who should reap the greatest rewards. In their minds, there was never any doubt that the future lay in further industrialization, in 'catching up' with the West. The leadership of both the UNP and SLFP has always represented this new elite and its mindset

These studies also reveal that modern nation states like Sri Lanka have been built only by stripping power and control from village regimes and creating structures of governance from which the common masses are excluded. The market economy too has expanded primarily by enabling state and commercial interests to gain control of territory that has traditionally been used and cherished by others, and by transforming that territory-together with the people themselves - into expendable "resources" for exploitation. The rape of Gal Oya, Sinharaja, Dumbara Valley and the proposed sale of Eppawela are just a few examples.. From this perspective, the processes that now go under the rubric of "nation-building", "economic growth" and "progress" are first and foremost processes of expropriation, exclusion, denial and dispossession.

Under these circumstances does it matter who becomes President?

If on the other hand, the on-going war has helped Sri Lanka remain as it is for future generations of more intelligent Lankans to develop; and, if it has prevented the North and East being turned overnight into a giant Hikkaduwa selling the sun, beach and fun to Eurotrash; and, if it has also prevented the rapid industrialization and sale of Lanka's natural resources; then, the Eelam war may be a boon not a curse. It is however most unfortunate and sad that the blood of our youth is the price we have to pay for the greed and stupidity of our elders.

As we approach the Presidential Elections as well as the new millennium, should it not become mandatory for all aspirants to office in Lanka or Eelam to state their intentions — their vision — if they have any? After all we all share the same elements — earth, wind, water, and fire. The sustainability of an island into the future cannot be based on a fence or a line.

The Information Age teaches us that there are currently two development options open to us. We have the New Industrialized Country (NIC) model touted by some and the other gentler Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) model which is promoted by others. Which model will the contenders choose?

And, what about the LTTE? We know they want territorial control of the North and East. We know that they have displayed fearless courage in taking on the centre — but is that enough? What is their vision for Eelam? Does their idea of development include rapid industrialization and pollution? Judging by the use of agro-chemicals in the North and East, the lifestyles of expatriate Tamils in the West, and modern Tamils in Lanka - Eelam can only be a parody of what it means to be Tamil.

I would like to take the opportunity presented by these elections to ask leaders of this country to choose between the alternatives: NIC or ESD? I would also like the LTTE theoreticians to comment on these options. After all only those truly concerned about a sustainable motherland can call this island their homeland - everything else is defilement.

Who rules is not the question - the governing principles are. Here then are the options.

Esd & Nic Table
NIC

New Industrialised Country
The model for other countries promoted by the First World.

WORLD VIEW
Domination Over Nature i.e. Agro-lndustry

l. Dependent on heavy external inputs.
2. Expansion leads to loss in bio-diversity.
3. No buffer against market control and natural disasters.

VALUE SYSTEM

Nature valued as an exploitable resource.
Intrinsic value confined to an economic system.

1. Externalities such as air and water which are public goods owned by all are not taken into economic accounting.
2.1ntrinsic values confined to economic variables only (e.g. Price, demand etc.) as accepted today.
3. Consequently air, water and the health of the environment decreases with economic growth.

SOCIAL GOALS
Technological Supremacy

l. Stock market and Western technology are the measures of society's success. (This abstracts the individual)

LIFESTYLES
Competitive Lifestyles

1. Competitive lifestyles become the norm and measure of evaluation with personal ambition as the most important asset.

DEVELOPMENTAL GOALS
Material Economic Growth

1. All that is gained is conceptual. A paper based value system, once based on gold, now based on promises and forecasts.
2. Reflection of market values is by definition.

RESOURCE EVALUATION
Unlimited Resources
1 . i.e. Adam Smith's view of the world.

ECONOMIC SYSTEM
Consumerism

1. Value on Consumerism

GOVERNMENT
Centralised/Urban Centred Focus

1. Strong centralisation necessary for efficient management of large systems of production.
2. Technocratic.

ESD
Ecologically Sustainable Development
A global model for our survival,

WORLD VIEW

Harmony with nature i.e. Sustainable Agriculture
1. Department on internal inputs.
2. Maintenance of bio-diversity.
3. Risk reduction in marketing and buffer against natural disasters.

VALUE SYSTEM
Natural Environment valued for itself
Intrinsic values cover all life including humans

1. Externalities such as air and water are taken into economic accounting.
2, Intrinsic value extends to cover environmental variables.
3. Consequently the health of the environment is protected and improves with economic growth.

SOCIAL GOALS
Environmental Supremacy

1. The individual is society's most important factor. Each is a biological entity dependent for his/her health on the health of the environment. The performance of technological and economic indicators alone does not provide social equity on an individual basis.

LIFESTYLES
Co-operative Vocational Lifestvles

1. The recognition that co-operative lifestyles and respect for vocation is the characteristic of this model.

DEVELOPMENTAL GOALS

1. Physical changes within the environment with tangible benefit.
2. Reflection of the market value is linked to real material i.e. wood, agricultural product.

RESOURCE Evaluation
Limited Resource

1. i.e. Mahathma Gandhi's vision for India as stated in his speech in Lok Sabha when India gained her Independence.

ECONOMIC SYSTEM
Conservation

1. Value on conservation, savings.

GOVERNMENT
Decentralised/Bio-regional/Neighborhood Focus

1. De-centralised on social, cultural and environmental criteria that recognises the potential and the limitations of the management of such an area.
2. Participatory Democracy.

Index Page
Front Page
News/Comments
Editorial/Opinion
Business
Sports
Sports Plus
Mirrror Magazine
Line

More Plus

Return to Plus Contents

Line

Plus Archives

Front Page| News/Comment| Editorial/Opinion| Plus| Business| Sports| Sports Plus| Mirror Magazine

Please send your comments and suggestions on this web site to

The Sunday Times or to Information Laboratories (Pvt.) Ltd.

Presented on the World Wide Web by Infomation Laboratories (Pvt.) Ltd.

Hosted By LAcNet