Times 2

Delhi's 100th birthday stirs debate on colonial era

By Ben Sheppard

NEW DELHI, (AFP) - New Delhi reaches 100 next month, not knowing whether to mark the birthday with celebrations of its run-away success or to ignore a date that revives memories of British colonial rule.
On December 12, 1911, King George V called all Indian princes and rulers to a "durbar" pageant on a flat piece of land north of the old city of Delhi and declared the national capital would move there from Calcutta.

The decision, which came as a surprise even to senior British officers, was based on worsening unrest in the Calcutta region and Delhi's more strategic position in the centre of the subcontinent. One hundred years on, Delhi is a vast mega-city at the heart of India's booming economy with up to 18 million inhabitants living in sprawling low-rise suburbs that stretch across the Yamuna floodplain.

A statue of Lord Hardinge viceroy of India (1911-1916) is pictured during construction work at Coronation Park in New Delhi. AFP

"Yes, there is ambivalence on what to celebrate and how to celebrate," Delhi's chief minister Sheila Dikshit admitted in early November, as questions grow over whether any major events are planned for the city's centenary. "(The) ministry of culture has to draw up a plan... I feel they don't have a clear direction yet," she added.

The site of the lavish 1911 durbar did not actually become "New Delhi" as ground to the south of the old city was preferred, and the spot instead became a graveyard for British imperial statues discarded after independence in 1947.

Derelict and forgotten for decades, "Coronation Park" is now undergoing a slow renovation process, but it will not be ready for any celebrations on December 12. For A.G. Krishna Menon, the Delhi head of the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH), glossing over the events of 100 years ago is to try to re-write the past.

"This is a chance to increase awareness about the city around us," he said. "There is a debate on whether we should be celebrating or not but, as conservationists, we say it is part of history that must be recognised.

"New Delhi was designed by the British but could not have been built anywhere else due to the Indian craftsmen, builders and Indian sensibilities." In the eyes of many visitors and locals, New Delhi's grand imperial architecture is one of the great sights of India, including the 340-room presidential palace from where the British viceroy once ruled over the nation.

Menon believes the buildings and monuments are now rightly a symbol of national pride. "When I stand there, a lot of things resonate. All of it adds up to a positive idea of the country," he said.

Indians often point out that Delhi was previously a major Mughal capital, and that the "New Delhi" built by British architects Edwin Lutyens and Herbert Baker was just the latest of several cities in the same area.
"This is an occasion to mark 1911 as the re-emergence of Delhi as a capital," said Mahesh Rangarajan, an Indian historian who specialises in the British Raj.

A man looks at the Coronation Memorial obelisk at Coronation Park in New Delh. AFP

"India lived under an occupying power then, and the British thought they would be here for centuries when they built New Delhi. But the empire was gone just a few years later. "Colonial rule was often painful, but it is seen here as just another layer of history." Lutyens himself harboured racist views about the Indian people, and very few locals turned up to celebrate the city's inauguration when it was finally completed in 1931.

Many British tourists often say they are fascinated, if not always proud, of their country's former presence in India, and that they are struck by the lack of bitterness among locals. Mark Tully, the veteran BBC reporter and doyen of British writers on India, sees the moulding of old Delhi, imperial Delhi and the modern expanding city of today as a reflection of the nation's flexibility.

"It is about Indians' ability to live with variety, to preserve their culture, and yet to be affected by other cultures," he said. "Some Indians feel very strongly that New Delhi is a colonial imposition and that this date is not something to celebrate, but I think they are in a minority.

"I come from an old British Raj family, and in more than 40 years living here I have never once had that fact thrown in my face. Indians are remarkably mature about their colonial background." Authorities in Delhi are still promising to arrange some kind of celebrations around December 12, but most residents in the teeming and chaotic city will be unaware of its 100th birthday.

As the city grows rapidly with new metro lines, highways and satellite towns all mushrooming up, many citizens instead look ahead to a new global order in which India itself is becoming a dominant force.

Top to the page  |  E-mail  |  views[1]
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
 
Other Times 2 Articles
Suu Kyi hails US engagement
Pak actress’ nude 'ISI' pic sparks row
Expelled Iranian diplomats arrive in Tehran
Australia's ruling Labour backs gay marriage
Saudis fear there will be 'no more virgins' if ban on female drivers are lifted
Angry Indian farmers give snakes to alleged bribe seekers
Sanctions are only a small part of the history that makes Iranians hate Britain
Maldives, take note: Doomsday predictions on sea level rises are 'false alarm'
Delhi's 100th birthday stirs debate on colonial era
China 'has up to 3,000 nukes hidden in tunnels'
Rolls-Royce, Aston Martin, Ferrari, corruption and aid
2012 Mayan prediction misread
Turkey is ready to invade Syria
Syria army defectors target Assad's military convoys
Assad survives on support of Russia-China
Iran's rattling sabre
The American hangover: Return to the humble life
US government may be threatened as cheapest borrower

 

 
Reproduction of articles permitted when used without any alterations to contents and a link to the source page.
© Copyright 1996 - 2011 | Wijeya Newspapers Ltd.Colombo. Sri Lanka. All Rights Reserved | Site best viewed in IE ver 8.0 @ 1024 x 768 resolution