| Team 
              spirit for business and politics A young visionary professional, with a flair for explaining complex 
              philosophical thoughts and management principles in simple language 
              to any audience was recently addressing a sales team. He was comparing 
              the differences between a "group" and a "team" 
              and for this purpose he used a day-to-day practical scene, of a 
              crowd of commuters gathered at a bus halt, waiting impatiently for 
              the buses on the selected route. Whilst waiting for the much-delayed 
              bus they have a single common interest.
 In 
              pursuit of that interest they were of one voice in recognizing the 
              parlous state of public transport, uncaring attitude of the bus 
              companies and what action they must take together to protect their 
              interests as commuters. When the much-delayed bus arrived, they 
              forget their togetherness and comradeship of a few minutes before. 
              It was one scramble towards the bus, resembling a rugby scrum, to 
              get in and preferably get a seat before fellow passengers.   The 
              crowd at the bus halt was only a "group", with individual 
              interests, momentarily finding a common interest to work together. 
              A "team", on the other hand, was described as a group 
              bound by a common committed value system linking together and supporting 
              each other to achieve both individual and collective goals. How 
              right was this young professional when we take his analogy into 
              politics and business.   In 
              politics the aspirant candidates before elections have common party 
              interests and are together in public platforms. Outside of these 
              common interests what wouldn't they do to get a "manape", 
              in preference to their own mates? It is the same with alliances 
              before elections and after, especially if the alliance partner is 
              consigned to the opposition.   In 
              business the so-called collectives, the Chambers, are all for the 
              advancement of the nation and the private sector, their members 
              and public at large. They get together for this common cause and 
              make submissions so poetically drafted to demonstrate the advancement 
              the nation and the private sector. In private they advance only 
              areas or submissions of personal or network interests.   Do 
              the Chambers in this country fall into the same frame as the crowd 
              of commuters at the bus halt? Do these leaders of the engine of 
              growth even resemble a pack of vultures waiting for the moment they 
              have a chance to beat the rest and take a pick of the best piece 
              of meat forgetting the rest in the team and the members at large? 
              We have seen leaders advancing their personal interests by going 
              after and sucking up to power and wealth hungry politicians. Certainly 
              if the past is any indication business sector collectives are nowhere 
              close to a team, with common value bondage.   It 
              is time that both politicians and business leaders learn lessons 
              from the group dynamics of a team of ducks flying in formation. 
              The inverted "V" shape formation is no accident or chance. 
              The dynamics of this formation has been determined to be the most 
              effective method of reducing the impact of friction and pressure 
              from air and wind.   The 
              change from time to time of the team taking the frontline positions 
              in the formation and thus the maximum pressure, to allow some to 
              rest and others to lead with the optimum effectiveness are all acts 
              of a truly committed team.  The 
              ones at the rear honking to encourage and motivate the team and 
              the directional navigation leadership of the duck at the head of 
              the formations are other signs of a truly committed team. If one 
              of the ducks is injured or unable to meet the demands of the team 
              in formation, it drops out of the formation along with a helper 
              so as not to slow the team.   This 
              is another incredible behaviour of this team (the helper stays with 
              the injured until it recovers or dies before flying off together 
              or alone as the case may be). The team Singapore under the able 
              leadership of Lee Kuwan Yew has consistently demonstrated in the 
              political, administrative and business arena what a "Team" 
              with a vision, a shared value system and commitment can deliver 
              to a nation and its people.   It 
              is the fervent wish of the civil society, that those in charge of 
              the nation in politics, governance and business will take a lesson 
              from the flying ducks and become a team committed to take this nation, 
              the private sector and the people to its true potential, rather 
              than act like the group of commuters at a bus halt.  |