Uncertainty clouds rosy forecasts
The rosy economic statistics trotted out by the government, while pointing to a tentative recovery, does not appear to have done much to inspire confidence in the corporate sector, which is still to put its money where its mouth is. The Central Bank itself, which put out the figures, has said it does not know why the private sector was not more forthcoming and going ahead with the new investments that are required to sustain the recovery.

This is because there are still deep misgivings about the ultimate success of the peace effort, the government's ability to push through unpalatable economic reforms, the stability of the ruling coalition itself, rumblings of discontent among labour unions, the uneasy 'cohabitation' arrangement between the president and the prime minister, and the possibility of a PA-JVP combine replacing the ruling United National Front. There is also growing concern about the increasing number of industries that are being closed, as banks step up efforts to recover loans, and the sudden blackouts that seem to be plaguing the country again, despite government assurances that there will be no more power cuts.

The UNF government appears to be trying to create a false 'feel-good' effect, such as the project to 'light up' Colombo, which many consider to be misguided given the uncertain outlook for power generation and warnings of power cuts in the future when demand outstrips supply. The unbridled waste and corruption that seems to go on whatever government is in power is another cause for concern. Government efforts to shed excess labour - partly its own creation since all recent governments stuffed state bodies with supporters of politicians - should be extended to the excess manpower in the Cabinet, which is far out of proportion to the country's needs and capacity.

It is indeed revolting that when the country's finances are in such dire straits that the government should not only continue with a bloated Cabinet but even seek to expand it.

The forced closures of industries - which seem to be on the increase going by the parate execution advertisements - does not augur well for the country's efforts to expand its manufacturing base and create the jobs that are sorely required to reduce the ranks of the unemployed and ward off possible social unrest that such idle minds could generate. A belief has been expressed that we're becoming a nation of shopkeepers given the closures of industries and the expansion of the services sector. Entrepreneurs who took the risk of venturing into manufacturing are putting up shutters and moving into trading. It is said to be cheaper to import rather than manufacture locally.

While this country may not be able to manufacture as many products as it would wish, given the small size of the domestic market and the difficulties in accessing modern technology, it makes sense to try to make whatever is possible and reduce our reliance on imports which drains valuable foreign exchange. The efforts of successive governments to protect and expand our manufacturing base appear to have failed.

The signs of growing JVP-inspired industrial unrest, with the former militant group using its clout in the labour unions to disrupt business activity, is another danger signal that the government would be ill-advised to ignore.

The corporate sector is also worried about what would happen to the peace process and the economic reforms if a PA-JVP alliance comes to power. The two parties have been making threatening noises against both these initiatives and there are genuine fears that the economic stabilisation measures and the reforms process set in motion by the UNF could be destabilised.


BOI sees surge in investments
By Rajika Chelvaratnam
The Board of Investment expects a big increase in investment this year, mainly in the infrastructure sector. The board itself is being re-organised into five regional entities that will operate under the federal system of government proposed to end the ethnic war. In this interview, BOI chairman Arjunna Mahendran gives an account of the current state of investments in the island and the projects in the pipeline.

How much investment did Sri Lanka attract last year?

Last year, according to the Central Bank, for the first six months we got $120 million worth of foreign investments. That compares with the $80 million for the full year of 2001. I think in the previous five years from 1995 to 2000 we never exceeded about $120 million for the whole year. For the full year last year the Central Bank is expecting about $240 million. I think it will be higher. I was targeting around $300 million.

What about local investments?

Local investments are difficult to quantify because we don't handle all the local investments, particularly the expansion of some existing industries. But I would reckon going on our numbers that local investments would be around the same figure. In other words we are looking at somewhere between $100 - 150 million last year. In total we would have got around $500 million last year which is not bad.

What are the investments in the pipeline this year?

This year we are going to see a huge surge. In fact this year I am targeting $500 million from abroad and most of that I think will come from the field of infrastructure. Already we are finalising plans for investments in three major sectors, in power, highways and telecommunications. In the power sector a lot of private generation projects are already underway. And the government is just about to award a new project for an additional 200 megawatts of power generation.

On the hydropower side there are about five projects coming up, for hydroelectric schemes up to about 50 megawatts each. They will also be implemented this year. Generally one megawatt will bring in about a million dollars. So we will get about $200 million this year just from power alone.

In relation to highways, we hope to seal the Colombo-Katunayake expressway project by April. The total project cost is about $137 million spread over a period of three years. That means for this year alone we will get around $30 million from the Colombo-Katunayake expressway. Then the Colombo-Kandy highway has also been advertised and eleven foreign companies have bid for that. We think that by the end of this year we can finalise that agreement which means that around another $10 to 20 million will come in.

There is much potential for a lot of investments to come in on telecommunications. Already Dialog GSM, which is owned by a Malaysian company, has committed $100 million to Sri Lanka alone, of which last year they brought $25 million, and this year I think they will bring in the balance $75 million.

The government is also going to open up the international gateway. At the moment the international gateway that brings all the calls into Sri Lanka is monopolised by Sri Lanka Telecom. Last month it was advertised for people to make bids to run separate gateways. So now we are moving towards a multiple gateway type of situation in telecom. So when those bidders come in I think you can see a lot of investments. Therefore on the telecom side we can see about $100 million this year alone.

Is this only by way of foreign investments? What about local investments this year?

Local investments I haven't taken into account. I'm expecting $500 million from foreign investments. The other $150 million will come in from manufacturing projects. Prima is doubling the size of its plant in Trincomalee, that is a major addition. Tokyo Cement is also doubling the capacity of their cement factory in Trincomalee. Then I expect a lot of companies here in the south to expand their production capacities. Then in the textile sector there are about three new textile mills coming in. The most interesting area will be tourism. We expect at least three big hotel operators to come in this year. I think our local investors will bring in about $200 to 300 million.

There were many BOI projects in the past which were not actually implemented. Why is this?

I would say about 60 to 70 percent of the projects that had been approved in January last year were not implemented. The reason was that under the previous government they removed the powers of the BOI to give tax incentives. We could not encourage companies to go ahead and enjoy those benefits, so they did not make the investments.

In April last year I asked the minister to reintroduce the BOI Bill to parliament and we got those powers back, which was a big step forward. That cleared about 30 percent of the projects that had not been implemented. But there still remains a hard-core of about 40 to 50 percent of projects which are still not off the ground. The main reason was that there are many government agencies with which we have to coordinate to get approval, because a lot of these projects involve getting loans. In the past the process had been very bureaucratic. Now I have got approval from the cabinet of ministers to require any government agency to give me an answer within two to four weeks. We have set up a high-level facilitatory committee which would comprise of very senior officials in the government and we'll try and expedite the approval of these projects.

This year I want to increase the implementation of projects to about 50 percent and that's a big leap forward.

How about investment plans in Trincomalee?

Some existing companies are expanding very aggressively. Trinco is being subject to an overall development plan. There is a very ambitious plan to set up a coal power plant there. A very large investor, which is a joint venture between Indians, Germans and Scandinavians, wants to set up a project to refine coal. That and the coal power plan has to be accommodated in Trincomalee.

Of course a lot of tourist-related projects are also interested in coming in. But that will be subject to a market plan. There is a very interesting proposal from an Australian company to start a whale watching tourism site in Trincomalee because it has a very unique harbour where whales actually swim into the harbour.

What is the status of the plans for restructuring the BOI into five regional commissions?

The parliament passed the Act which will give effect to the new body on the December 10. We are now in the process of recruiting high-powered chief executives for the five commissions. They are going to be called the Regional Economic Development Commissions.

The five commissions will be set up in five different areas in the country. The Western province, the Southern province, the Central region, the North Central and North Western province and finally the North and the Eastern province.

Each of those commissions will have complete powers to plan and develop infrastructure so that investments will flow into those regions. The five regions will have different strengths.

These commissions are being set up so that they can coordinate the investments which at the moment is fragmented.

What is the status of the plan to modernise the Colombo airport and the proposed investment by a US company in air traffic control?There have been some proposals by various companies. Airports are no longer run by single companies. Worldwide there is a great degree of specialisation.

Lockheed Martin have come to us and said they are interested in managing our airspace. They would prefer to come through our airspace provided we manage that more effectively with their equipment. It is still in the proposal stage but we are fairly confident that we will have some sort of approval for this project in about two or three weeks' time.

Then we plan to privatise the airport itself which involves the management of the terminals and the runway and all the infrastructure of the airport.

What is the contribution or involvement of the BOI with the peace process?

The contribution of the BOI to the peace process is to see that the economy revives, for peace is not something you can fill your stomach with. The government, according to the prime minister, is bankrupt. The BOI has to bring in foreign investments to fill that gap, to build our infrastructure and to set up factories. All the development activities in the countries at the moment is taking place through the BOI.


Sponsorships for weddings, birthday parties in the US
By Jamie Seaton
While living overseas I spent countless hours explaining that America wasn't really crassly materialistic, it only looked that way from the outside. Unfortunately I was wrong. In the two years since I've moved back, I've been repeatedly stunned and dismayed at just how materialistic some of us can be.

In July 2001, I watched as a couple offered up naming rights to their unborn son on national television. The expectant parents made the rounds of all the chat shows, inviting corporations to 'name that boy' for a mere $500,000. Can you imagine the trauma of being introduced in schools as Coca-Cola, or worse, Enron? Luckily for him, America's corporations didn't bite.

Sponsorships
But that hasn't stopped other enterprising Americans from jumping on the bandwagon. Last June a couple in Atlanta had the wedding of their dreams, thanks to their corporate sponsors. The bride know just what she wanted; she also knew that she couldn't afford her fantasy. So she wrote proposal letters and made deals with 17 separate companies - all to the tune of $ 15,000. In return, she handed sponsor information to the 125 guests who attended the nuptials. Those guests must have felt really special.

Then there's the case of Peter Shankman, who turned 30 in August and threw himself a hell of a party. Shankman, CEO of the Geek Factory, a marketing and events planning business in Manhattan, used his professional contacts and savvy to generate about $ 15,000 in donated goods and cash (Shankman threw in $ 14,000 of his own funds). One sponsor paid the rental on the space, another donated food, another, vodka. "I do public relations and marketing for a living," said Shankman when asked to explain how he came up with idea. "I know the movers and shakers in the industry and I knew that any sponsor's ad or product would be seen by the right people. Every company I contacted contributed in some way.”

Changing expectations
It would seem that American consumers are beginning to expect a great deal from their favourite companies. And that's just what's going on, according to Melten Tekeli, chief marketing officer of IEG Sponsor Direct, which provides an online marketplace for buying and selling sponsorships. "Consumers are not the same as they were 10 years ago," explained Tekeli. "They are much more savvy and informed and they expect more. The paradigm has shifted from 'what does this company want me to do? To what can this company do for me?"

Emerging trends
This emerging narcissism dovetails perfectly with some emerging trends in the marketplace. In 2001, corporate sponsorship in North America was a $ 9.3 billion business; in 2002 that figure is projected to grow to $ 9.57 billion - an increase of 3%. At the same time, advertising revenue is projected to shrink by roughly 4%. "It's very difficult to differentiate products these days, and the way companies are distinguishing themselves is through branding," said Tekeli. "The goal is to create a brand experience, and sponsorship provides the perfect platform for consumers to experience a brand." Sponsorship has become a leading discipline in marketing, says Tekeli, because it brings all components together in a thematic framework. (And as we all know, integration creates synergy.)

To be fair, sponsorship can be a great thing. Where would charitable and fund raising events be without corporate sponsors, after all? That corporations would want to sponsor weddings and birthday parties - where they are guaranteed a specific demographic - makes perfect sense from a marketing perspective. My gripe is with the individuals who have hijacked corporate sponsorships for their own gain. It's an extension of the me-first attitude that permeates American society.

It has become acceptable to expect others to finance our lives.Many of us would like some extra cash to raise our children, a lavish wedding or swank New York birthday party. That doesn't mean we're entitled to it.
(Courtesy: UK-based CIM magazine)


Back to Top  Back to Business  

Copyright © 2001 Wijeya Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Webmaster